--- Ramsey <ramsey@nym.alias.net> wrote:
> From Ramsey Thu Sep 23 16:20:09 1999
> X-Apparently-To: gsquared100@yahoo.com via
> mdd501.mail.yahoo.com
> Received: from anon.lcs.mit.edu (18.26.0.254)
>   by mta109.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Sep 1999
> 16:22:54 -0700
> Date: 23 Sep 1999 23:20:09 -0000
> Message-ID:
> <19990923232009.22544.qmail@nym.alias.net>
> From: Ramsey <ramsey@nym.alias.net>
> To: gsquared100@yahoo.com
> Subject: Michael
> Content-Length: 1412
> 
> Gail,
> 
> Another mail has been sent to Michael. I do not
> think he would 
> mind if you saw my first two paragraphs to him. It
> was as 
> follows:
> 
> BEGIN
> 
> In a way, I hope for longer responses from you here;
> however, you 
> listen so well. I appreciate you making me feel
> comfortable to 
> talk to you here. After all, that is the purpose for
> our 
> correspondence - your listening to me as you have
> done so well in 
> the past. Moreover, the final product of your
> listening to me and 
> my husband has always represented my family,
> truthfully and 
> respectfully - thank you, Michael. It is my trust in
> your 
> fabulous ability that leads me to believe that you
> can once again 
> represent me, truthfully and respectfully.
> 
> I understand that you indirectly took my husband's
> part on a news 
> program last eve. I also understand that your
> emotions seemed to 
> run somewhat higher than in the past. I thank you
> for indirectly 
> taking my husband's part, in a show of emotions that
> possibly 
> served to defend him. I also understand that you
> could not give a 
> definitive answer in response to whether you
> believed this case 
> would ever be solved. I hope my words to you here
> caused your 
> hesitation to affirm that the killer will never be
> brought to 
> justice.
> 
> END
> 
> I wanted to share those paragraphs with you. Again,
> I do not 
> think he would mind my mention of that.
> 
> Thank you for your concern. I hope to talk to you
> more, later.
> 
> Patricia